This article presents a comparison of data obtained from a low‐temperature cure of an epoxy/amine system by three independent cure monitoring techniques: ultrasonic wave propagation, dielectric permittivity, and nuclear magnetic resonance. The sizes and thermal histories of the samples studied by the three techniques were controlled for comparability between the methods. The three techniques gave consistent information on the progress of cure and were complementary, in that each was particularly sensitive to different stages of the cure process.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Challis et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: