Key result
Enoxaparin with high-dose tirofiban reduces post-PCI thrombin and inflammation markers versus UFH with tirofiban.
Why the study?
Does enoxaparin with high-dose tirofiban reduce inflammatory and thrombotic markers compared to UFH with high-dose tirofiban in high-risk ACS patients undergoing PCI?
RCT (n=60)
Open-label
No
Does enoxaparin with high-dose tirofiban reduce inflammatory and thrombotic markers compared to UFH with high-dose tirofiban in high-risk ACS patients undergoing PCI?
The combination of high-dose tirofiban with enoxaparin attenuates the inflammatory response compared to high-dose tirofiban with UFH in high-risk ACS patients undergoing PCI.
Enoxaparin may be preferred over UFH with high-dose tirofiban in high-risk ACS PCI to reduce post-procedural thrombotic and inflammatory markers; extends anticoagulant comparisons in this setting.
AIM: The study assessed the benefit of high bolus dose tirofiban (HD-tirofiban) with enoxaparin compared with HD-tirofiban with unfractionated heparin (UFH). The study examined markers of platelet activation, thrombin generation and inflammation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study is a prospective single centre open-label trial of patients with high-risk acute coronary syndrome treated with percutaneous intervention (PCI) who were randomized to anticoagulation with UFH or enoxaparin with HD-tirofiban (25 microg kg(-1) bolus). This study measured a panel of platelet activation markers, inflammatory biomarkers and thrombus generation between the two groups. RESULT: Sixty patients undergoing high-risk PCI were enroled in the study. Platelet inhibition as assessed by whole blood aggregometry following HD-tirofiban infusion was similar in both the UFH and enoxaparin groups. CD40 ligand expression on platelets was significantly reduced following PCI with HD-tirofiban and either UFH or enoxaparin. Following PCI, there were significant reductions measured in other markers of platelet activation including PAC-1, P selectin, factor V/Va, platelet-monocyte aggregates and monocyte expression of Mac-1 as determined by analysis of venous blood samples using flow cytometry. Prothrombin fragment 1+2, D-dimer, von Willebrand factor and high sensitive C-reactive protein levels were significantly less post PCI in the enoxaparin group compared with those patients receiving UFH. CONCLUSION: The combination of HD tirofiban with enoxaparin resulted in an attenuated inflammatory response when compared with that of the combination of HD tirofiban with UFH.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Walters et al. (2009) conducted an RCT in High-risk acute coronary syndrome (n=60). Enoxaparin with high-dose tirofiban vs. Unfractionated heparin (UFH) with high-dose tirofiban was evaluated on Markers of platelet activation, thrombin generation and inflammation. Enoxaparin with high-dose tirofiban resulted in significantly lower levels of prothrombin fragment 1+2, D-dimer, von Willebrand factor, and hs-CRP post-PCI compared to UFH with high-dose tirofiban.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: