Reactions of [UMe2(C5Me5)2] with primary aromatic or aliphatic amines led to the rapid formation of monomeric uranium(IV) complexes [U(C5Me5)2(NHR)2](R = 2,6-dimethylphenyl 1, Et 2 or But3). The compounds were characterized by standard techniques and for 1, by X-ray diffraction. In co-ordinating solvents like tetrahydrofuran (thf) compound 1 reacted intramolecularly releasing one primary amine and forming the imidouranium(IV)[U(C5Me5)2{N(C6H3Me2-2,6)}]·thf 4, whereas in non-co-ordinating solvents the base-free [U(C5Me5)2{N(C6H3Me2-2,6)}]5 was obtained. The thf in 4 was found not to be in equilibrium with bulk solvents, and different proton chemical shifts for the adducted base were observed as a function of temperature following a Curie–Weiss behaviour. σ-Bond metathesis reactions of the bis(amido) and/or imido complexes with terminal alkynes produced the bis(acetylide) complexes [U(C5Me5)2(CCR)2](R = Ph 6 or But7) active species for the regioselective oligomerization of terminal alkynes, which can be prepared also from the reaction of [UMe2(C5Me5)2] with 2 equivalents of the corresponding terminal alkyne. Reactivity studies show the possible interconversion among these bis(amido), imido and bis(acetylide) complexes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Straub et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: