// Mohamed Ben-Eltriki 1, 2 , Subrata Deb 5 , Mohamed Hassona 1 , Gray Meckling 1 , Ladan Fazli 1, 3 , Mei Yieng Chin 1 , Nada Lallous 1 , Takeshi Yamazaki 1 , William Jia 4 , Paul S. Rennie 1, 3 , Artem Cherkasov 1 and Emma S. Tomlinson Guns 1, 3 1 The Vancouver Prostate Centre at Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada 2 Department of Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada 3 Department of Urologic Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada 4 Department of Surgery and Brain Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada 5 Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Larkin University, Miami, FL, USA Correspondence to: Emma S. Tomlinson Guns, email: eguns@prostatecentre.com Keywords: 20(S)-protopanaxadiol ginsenoside; androgen receptor; apoptosis; castration resistant prostate cancer Received: August 25, 2017 Accepted: February 24, 2018 Published: April 20, 2018 ABSTRACT We have explored the effects of 20(S)-protopanaxadiol (aPPD), a naturally derived ginsenoside, against androgen receptor (AR) positive castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) xenograft tumors and have examined its interactions with AR. In silico docking studies for aPPD binding to AR, alongside transactivation bioassays and in vivo efficacy studies were carried out in the castration-resistant C4-2 xenograft model. Immunohistochemical (IHC) and Western blot analyses followed by evaluation of AR, apoptotic, cell cycle and proliferative markers in excised tumors was performed. The growth of established CRPC tumors was inhibited by 53% with aPPD and a corresponding decrease in serum PSA was seen compared to controls. The IHC data revealed that Ki-67 was significantly lower for aPPD treated tumors and was associated with elevated p21 and cleaved caspase-3 expression, compared to vehicle treatment. Furthermore, aPPD decreased AR protein expression in xenograft tumors, while significantly upregulating p27 and Bax protein levels. In vitro data supporting this suggests that aPPD binds to and significantly inhibits the N-terminal or the DNA binding domains of AR. The AR androgen binding site docking score for androgen (dihydrotestosterone) was -11.1, while that of aPPD was -7.1. The novel findings described herein indicate aPPD potently inhibits PCa in vivo partly via inhibition of a site on the AR N-terminal domain. This manifested as cell cycle arrest and concurrent induction of apoptosis via an increase in Bax, cleaved-caspase-3, p27 and p21 expression.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ben‐Eltriki et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: