Key result
Mitral valve repair outperforms replacement for mitral prolapse with a long-term reoperation rate of ~10%.
Why the study?
Does mitral valve repair improve long-term outcomes compared to prosthetic valve replacement in patients with mitral valve prolapse?
Does mitral valve repair improve long-term outcomes compared to prosthetic valve replacement in patients with mitral valve prolapse?
Mitral valve repair is the preferred surgical approach for mitral valve prolapse, offering excellent long-term durability and avoiding complications associated with prosthetic valves.
Valve plasty may enable medication-free quality of life in mitral regurgitation; leaves open confirmation versus replacement in prospective trials.
Prosthetic valve replacement has mainly been performed on patients with mitral regurgitation. In such cases, prosthetic valve related complications, such as thromboembolism, bleeding, prosthetic valve infection, and structural valve deterioration, are unavoidable. With valve plasty, however, not only can such complications be avoided, but patients can also have as good a quality of life as healthy people without medications. Although mitral valve plasty requires complicated techniques like chordal reconstruction and has problems of residue, recurrence, and progression of regurgitation, patients with mitral valve prolapse are considered to be good candidates for this procedure. Mitral annuloplasty with a prosthetic ring is the essential and basic procedure of this operation, usually adding to the other techniques. Resection and suture methods of quadrangular resection, triangular resection and the sliding method, by which systolic anterior movement can be avoided, are indicated for patients with posterior leaflets prolapse. The resection and suture method, chordal shortening, and chordal transposition were previously done on patients with anterior leaflets prolapse, but recently chordal reconstruction using ePTFE (expanded polytetrafluoroethylene) is performed. Superior long-term results of mitral valve plasty for patients with mitral valve prolapse compared to prosthetic valve replacement have been reported. The 10-year reoperation rate of mitral valve plasty is only 7-10% as much as valve replacement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Y Nishimura (2015) conducted a review in Mitral valve prolapse. Mitral valve repair vs. Prosthetic valve replacement was evaluated. Mitral valve repair for patients with mitral valve prolapse provides superior long-term results compared to prosthetic valve replacement, with a 10-year reoperation rate of 7-10%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: