The first heterometallic derivative of the trinuclear WIV3 incomplete cuboidal cluster [W3S4(H2O)9]4+ has been prepared by reaction with (i) Cu metal, and (ii) Cu+ or CuCl(solid). In both cases the product is the cuboidal [W3CuS4(H2O)10]5+ ion. The corresponding reactions of [Mo3S4(H2O)9]4+ yield [Mo3Cu-S4(H2O)10]4+ and [Mo3CuS4(H2O)10]5+ respectively. The observation that the reaction of [W3S4(H2O)9]4+ with copper yields the 5+ and not the 4+ product suggests that the 4+ cluster is less stable in the tungsten case. Rate constants (25 °C) for the reaction of Cu+ with [W3S4(H2O)9]4+(1.82 × 103 M–1 s–1) and [Mo3S4(H2O)9]4+(980 M–1 s–1) suggest a similar addition process. The 1:1 stoichiometries for the oxidation of [W3CuS4(H2O)9]5+ with [Co(dipic)2]–(dipic = pyridine-2,6-dicarboxylate) and [Fe(H2O)6]3+ giving [W3S4(H2O)9]4+ and Cu2+ as products, further support the 5+ overall charge assignment. Rate constants have been determined and mechanisms assigned to these reactions. At 25°C, I= 2.00 M (LiClO4), the [Co(dipic)2]– reaction is outer-sphere with a rate constant of 17.7 × 103 M–1 s–1, while outer-sphere [Fe(H2O)6]3+(2.68 × 102 M–1 s–1) and inner-sphere [Fe(H2O)5(OH)]2+(5.0 × 105 M–1 s–1) reactions are observed for the FeIII oxidant. Rate constants are of the same order of magnitude to those for the corresponding reactions of [Mo3CuS4(H2O)10]5+, suggesting that a common electron-transfer process involving the copper centre may be relevant in both cases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nasreldin et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: