Key result
Vascular access evolves over four centuries into a safe and effective adjunct for parenteral nutrition.
Provides a historical overview of the development of vascular access techniques and technology over the past four centuries.
Historical evolution supports safe vascular access for parenteral nutrition; leaves open prospective evaluation of emerging technologies.
Milestones in the history of the development of vascular access and the subsequent advances in practical clinical applications of the knowledge, techniques, technology, and experience to the beneficial management of a variety of patients are described. The original achievements are presented and briefly discussed primarily, but not exclusively, in relationship to the successful development of parenteral nutrition (PN). Beginning with the discovery of the circulation of blood, landmark events, resulting from astute observations, experimentation, and ingenious technological advances, are summarized or outlined chronologically over the past 4 centuries, with emphasis on the many recent accomplishments of basic and clinical scientists during the past 6 decades. Brief descriptions of several seminal contributions to safe and effective IV access, management, and therapy acknowledge and recognize the historical highlights that have allowed a complex and potentially hazardous therapeutic modality to evolve into a commonly applied useful adjunct to our current inpatient and outpatient armamentarium. A comprehensive list of references documents the highlights of the development of vascular access for the student of history.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stanley J. Dudrick (2006) conducted a review in Vascular access. Vascular access was evaluated. The history of vascular access development over the past four centuries has evolved into a safe and effective adjunct for inpatient and outpatient therapies, particularly for parenteral nutrition.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: