Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Single crystals of n-type MoS 2 and n-MoSe 2 showed higher electrocatalytic activity for the evolution of H 2 (g) in alkaline solutions than in acidic solutions. The overpotentials required to drive hydrogen evolution at −10 mA cm –2 of current density for MoS 2 samples were −0.76 ± 0.13 and −1.03 ± 0.21 V when in contact with 1.0 M NaOH(aq) and 1.0 M H 2 SO 4 (aq), respectively. For MoSe 2 samples, the overpotentials at −10 mA cm –2 were −0.652 ± 0.050 and −0.709 ± 0.073 V in contact with 1.0 M KOH(aq) and 1.0 M H 2 SO 4 (aq), respectively. Single crystals from two additional sources were also tested, and the absolute values of the measured overpotentials were consistently less (by 460 ± 250 mV) in alkaline solutions than in acidic solutions. When electrochemical etching was used to create edge sites on the single crystals, the kinetics improved in acid but changed little in alkaline media. The overpotentials measured for polycrystalline thin films (PTFs) and amorphous forms of MoS 2 showed less sensitivity to pH and edge density than was observed for single crystals and showed enhanced kinetics in acid when compared to alkaline solutions. These results suggest that the active sites for hydrogen evolution on MoS 2 and MoSe 2 are different in alkaline and acidic media. Thus, while edges are known to serve as active sites in acidic media, in alkaline media it is more likely that terraces function in this role.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wiensch et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: