Key result
Dapagliflozin added to standard care proves cost-effective for HFrEF across nearly all evaluated countries.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to systematically review economic evaluations of dapagliflozin in patients with heart failure and describe their general and methodological features.
Is dapagliflozin cost-effective compared to standard drug treatment in patients with heart failure?
Systematic Review (n=8)
Is dapagliflozin cost-effective compared to standard drug treatment in patients with heart failure?
Dapagliflozin is generally considered a cost-effective treatment for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction across multiple developed and developing countries.
Supports reimbursement and formulary inclusion for dapagliflozin in HFrEF; extends cost-effectiveness evidence for SGLT2 inhibitors across healthcare systems.
Objective:The objective of this study is to systematically review the economic evaluations of dapagliflozin in the treatment of patients with heart failure (HF) and describe their general and methodological features. Methods:This systematic review followed the PRISMA guidelines. MEDLINE/PubMed, Website Of Science, Embase, The Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, CNKI, and Wanfang databases were searched to collect relevant studies, and the retrieval time ended on 31 October 2021. Articles on the economic evaluation of dapagliflozin in the treatment of heart failure were included. Secondary studies, incomplete economic indicators, and non-English-language and non-Chinese-language studies were excluded. Standard drug treatment was selected as the comparison. Basic characteristics, methods, and main results were extracted and analyzed systematically. Result:A total of eight studies were identified, and the overall quality was accepted, which were performed in nine developed countries (Austria, United States, Korea, Japan, Singapore, Spanish, Germany, and United Kingdom) and three developing countries (the Philippines, Thailand, and China). With the exception of the Philippines, the remaining countries considered that dapagliflozin was cost effective. In the analyses of all included studies, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were most sensitive to the cost of dapagliflozin, cardiovascular mortality, the duration of dapagliflozin effectiveness, and the probability of HF hospitalization. Conclusion:Dapagliflozin in the treatment of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction was considered cost effective. Further studies are needed to evaluate the comprehensive value of dapagliflozin on HF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2022) conducted a systematic review in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF) (n=8). Dapagliflozin vs. Standard drug treatment was evaluated on Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Dapagliflozin added to standard treatment for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction was considered cost-effective in 11 of 12 countries evaluated, with ICERs ranging from $4,041 to $83,650 per QALY gained.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: