Relevance: Successful glaucoma monitoring strongly depends on its progression prediction with the search for new clinical biomarkers. Purpose: To study new progression predictors of primary open angle glaucoma (POAG). Materials and methods: The 2-year clinical data of 85 POAG patients were prospectively analyzed. Optical coherence tomography-angiography was used to assess retinal microcirculation. Retrobulbar blood flow was assessed using color Doppler imaging. Functional progression was determined using Humphrey perimetry trend and event analyses, and structural loss – by means of SD-OCT negative slope of retinal nerve fiber layer and ganglion cells complex (GCC). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), the Wald Chi-Squared test of the generalized logistic mixed models and the multilevel mixed-effects models analysis were applied to differentiate between progression and non-progression eyes. A clinical biomarker was considered to be a predictor if the disease progression was confirmed by both perimetry and SD-OCT. Results: Vessel density (VD) of the parafoveal superficial plexus (AUC 0.776±0.07; Wald Chi-Squared test 12.5), macular thickness measured from the internal limiting membrane to the inner plexiform layer (0.751±0.06; 12.8), peak follow-up intraocular pressure (0.768±0.07; 9.3), end-diastolic velocity (EDV) of central retinal artery (0.715±0.11; 6.29), mean ocular perfusion pressure (0.682±0.08; 5.6) and focal loss volume of GCC (0.636±0.08; 5.0) were detected as significant predictors of glaucoma progression. According to the multilevel mixed-effects models analysis, only four predictors were determined: VD of the parafoveal superficial plexus (z -4.77), EDV of central retinal artery (z -3.08), focal loss volume of GCC (z 3.53) and peak follow-up intraocular pressure (z 3.20). Conclusion: The obtained data demonstrate the role of circulatory disorders in POAG progression and suggest parafoveal vessel density as the new predictor of glaucoma progression.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Курышева et al. (2022) studied this question.