Key result
Severely abnormal myocardial perfusion on PET linked to ~620% higher cardiac death risk in diabetes.
Why the study?
The study evaluated the prognostic value of myocardial perfusion PET for predicting risk in patients with and without diabetes mellitus.
Does stress myocardial perfusion PET provide incremental risk prediction for cardiac death in patients with and without diabetes?
Cohort (n=7,061)
Yes
Does stress myocardial perfusion PET provide incremental risk prediction for cardiac death in patients with and without diabetes?
Stress myocardial perfusion PET provides significant incremental prognostic value for predicting cardiac death beyond established clinical predictors in patients with and without diabetes.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Myocardial perfusion PET may refine cardiac death risk stratification in diabetes; leaves open whether findings alter management in prospective cohorts.
Purpose To evaluate the prognostic value of myocardial perfusion PET in patients with and patients without diabetes mellitus. Materials and Methods The authors performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively acquired data from a multicenter registry cohort of 7061 patients, including 1966 with diabetes mellitus, who underwent clinically indicated rest-stress rubidium 82 (82Rb) myocardial perfusion PET. The mean patient age (±standard deviation) was 63.3 years ± 13. Of the 7061 patients, 3348 were women (47.4%), 2296 (32.5%) had known coronary artery disease, and 1895 (26.8%) had previously undergone revascularization. The primary end point was cardiac death (n = 169) assessed at a mean of 2.5 years ± 1.5. The authors used Cox proportional hazards models and risk reclassification measures stratified according to diabetes status. Results In multivariable models adjusting for established clinical predictors, increasing magnitude of stress myocardial perfusion abnormality was associated with greater risk of cardiac death in patients with diabetes (hazard ratio [HR]: 7.2; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.1, 16.8) for severely abnormal myocardium compared with normal myocardium. The addition of stress myocardial perfusion imaging results significantly improved the fit of a clinical model for predicting cardiac death in patients with and patients without diabetes. Myocardial perfusion PET improved risk reclassification for cardiac death in patients with diabetes (category-based net reclassification index: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.15, 0.60, P < .001). Among diabetic patients, an abnormal myocardial perfusion PET scan was associated with increased risk of cardiac death (HR: 4.4; 95% CI: 2.0, 9.7) in all important clinical subgroups based on age, sex, obesity, or prior revascularization. Conclusion In a large cohort of patients referred for clinical 82Rb stress PET, myocardial perfusion imaging results provided incremental risk prediction of cardiac death in patients with and patients without diabetes mellitus.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Skali et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Patients referred for clinically indicated myocardial perfusion PET (n=7,061). Severely abnormal stress myocardial perfusion vs. Normal myocardium was evaluated on Cardiac death (HR 7.2, 95% CI 3.1-16.8). Severely abnormal stress myocardial perfusion on PET was associated with a greater risk of cardiac death compared to normal myocardium in patients with diabetes (HR 7.2; 95% CI 3.1-16.8).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: