Key result
Wireless sensor system measures heart rate with ~2% error versus traditional wired methods during exercise.
A novel wireless sensor system demonstrates high accuracy (error rate <2%) for heart rate monitoring during high-intensity athletic activities.
Supports wireless HR monitoring prototypes in exercise; leaves open clinical adoption pending prospective validation.
Athlete evaluation systems can effectively monitor daily training and boost performance to reduce injuries. Conventional heart-rate measurement systems can be easily affected by artifact movement, especially in the case of athletes. Significant noise can be generated owing to high-intensity activities. To improve the comfort for athletes and the accuracy of monitoring, we have proposed to combine robust heart rate and agility index monitoring algorithms into a small, light, and single node. A band-pass-filter-based R-wave detection algorithm was developed. The agility index was calculated by preprocessing with band-pass filtering and employing the zero-crossing detection method. The evaluation was conducted under both laboratory and field environments to verify the accuracy and reliability of the algorithm. The heart rate and agility index measurements can be wirelessly transmitted to a personal computer in real time by the ZigBee telecommunication system. The results show that the error rate of measurement of the heart rate is within 2%, which is comparable with that of the traditional wired measurement method. The sensitivity of the agility index, which could be distinguished as the activity speed, changed slightly. Thus, we confirmed that the developed algorithm could be used in an effective and safe exercise-evaluation system for athletes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2017) studied Healthy volunteers (n=20). Wireless patch-type sensor system vs. Standard wired equipment (CASE Cardiac Assessment System) was evaluated on Heart rate measurement error rate. The developed wireless sensor system measured heart rate with an error rate within 2% compared to traditional wired measurement methods during various exercise states.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: