Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
To achieve efficient and simultaneous removal of fluorine (F) and chlorine (Cl) from zinc (Zn) sulfate solution, a pre‐dilution and multi‐stage nanofiltration process was proposed. The Zn sulfate electrolyte, sourced from a Zn regeneration enterprise in Hunan Province, China, was treated via nanofiltration. The results indicated that the average recovery rates of Zn and sulfate were 98.76% and 98.12%, respectively, while the average removal rates for F and Cl were 45.24%–46.21% and 53.18%–71.30%. During the three‐stage nanofiltration process, the fluoride concentration decreased from 187.05 to 27.95 mg/L, and the chloride concentration was reduced from 1400.10 mg/L to 75.82 mg/L. The total removal rate of F and Cl was 85.06% and 94.59%, respectively. The presence of ZnF+ and ZnCl+ limited further enhancements in the average removal rates for F and Cl. The polypiperazine‐based composite membrane carried a negative charge due to the rapid ionization of the carboxyl group. A higher valence state of the anion and a greater negative charge favored retention by the nanofiltration membrane. The preferential molecular retention order is ZnSO4, ZnF2, and ZnCl2.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: