Key result
Multimodality CTA and TEE clarify a ring-like LV structure as focal noncompaction rather than pseudoaneurysm.
Case Report (n=1)
Multimodality imaging with CTA and TEE can effectively differentiate focal left ventricular noncompaction from pseudoaneurysm when unusual structures are seen on LV angiography.
Clinicians should consider multimodality imaging for ambiguous LV angiographic findings; this case leaves open broader applicability and validation.
A 48-year-old man underwent coronary angiography for evaluation of moderate, substernal, pressure-like chest pain, which lasted 30 minutes at rest with no relieving factors. The patient's cardiac biomarker levels and electrocardiographic results were normal, as was the coronary angiogram. A left ventricular (LV) angiogram revealed normal LV systolic function, but it also revealed a contrast-filled, ring-shaped structure (Fig. 1) in the inferior wall, outside the LV cavity, that raised concern about a possible LV pseudoaneurysm. In comparison with diastole (Fig. 1A), systole revealed thinning of the ring-like structure upon enlargement of the central filling defect (Fig. 1B), which suggested the presence of contractile myocardium in and around the ring. Multimodality imaging with use of cardiac computed tomographic angiography (CTA) and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) helped to define the nature (i.e., focal LV noncompaction) and extent of this ring-shaped structure. The cardiac CTA—at maximal intensity projection with multiplanar reconstruction—showed the intramyocardial location of the contrast-filled ring, which structure was larger in diastole (Fig. 2A) than in systole (Fig. 2B). The septal location of the multiple intramyocardial recesses was apparent in the cardiac CTA (Fig. 3). A volume-rendered cardiac CTA of only the contrast-enhanced cavities showed the spatial relationship of the intramyocardial recess, which traversed the posterior ventricular septum toward the apex and the anterior of the septum (Fig. 4). A hook-like area of contrast medium was noted in the septum as it moved toward the apex and pointed anteriorly. Repeat TEE confirmed the posterior septal location of these multiple interconnecting intra-myocardial recesses and cisterns, with contractile myocardium around them. Again, compared with the diastolic frame (Fig. 5A), the systolic frame (Fig. 5B) showed diminished size of the recesses and cisterns. Over one and one-half years of follow-up, the patient has done well.The differential diagnosis of contrast-medium appearance outside the LV cavity as seen on an LV angiogram should include a true aneurysm, a pseudoaneurysm, a “pseudopseudoaneurysm,” and a diverticulum. Pseudopseudoaneurysm (the false appearance of pseudoaneurysm) of the LV has been reported in other clinical settings.1,2 The intramyocardial location of these multiple interconnecting recesses and cisterns within contractile myocardium, as we noted upon viewing multimodality imaging that included TEE and CTA, helped to clarify what had looked like a single ring-like structure on the LV angiogram—and this supported the diagnosis of focal LV noncompaction.3 Unlike diverticula, these recesses become smaller in systole. The prognosis and prevalence of focal noncompaction is not well known.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Singh et al. (2014) conducted a case report in Focal left ventricular noncompaction (n=1). Multimodality imaging (cardiac CTA and TEE) was evaluated. Multimodality imaging with cardiac CTA and TEE clarified that a ring-like structure seen on LV angiography was focal left ventricular noncompaction rather than a pseudoaneurysm.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: