Use of nonionic surfactants in detergent products has become increasingly popular because of their tolerance to hardness ions and their effect on lowering the critical micelle concentration of anionics. Their performance as detergents, however, is very sensitive to changes in temperature and electrolyte concentration, which need to be carefully controlled in order to ensure that phase inversion conditions prevail. For a fixed temperature in an application, the only variables available for optimizing the performance of a system containing nonionics are: the type of nonionic, and the concentrations of electrolytes and anionics. Based on the mutual interactions of these ingredients in mixed systems, we have devised some guidelines for selection of the optimal ethylene oxide (FO) chain length in lauryl alcohol ethoxylate type of nonionics for a range of electrolytes and anionic surfactant concentrations. For any given concentration of electrolytes (sodium carbonate and sodium tripolyphosphate), anionic (sodium linear alkyl benzene sulfonate) and nonionic, the detergency of synthetic sebum from blended polyester/cotton fabrics shows a maximum as a function of average FO moles in the nonionic. Oil/water interfacial tension shows an expected reverse trend. The optimal EO moles (for maximal detergency) show a monotonically increasing trend when plotted as a function of the ratio of nonionic to anionic concentration for a fixed level of electrolyte. The optimal EO moles also increase with increasing level of electrolytes in the system. However, the effect of nonionic/anionic ratio is much stronger than the effect of electrolytes on the optimal EO moles.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Satish K. Goel (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: