Interviews with 66 residents of a Taiwanese village about their folk religion revealed that there is no simple division between believers and unbelievers, but rather that people's belief can be classified into four types, or modes: Intellectual belief, which tries to make sense out of reality; true belief, which accepts everything with total credulity; practical belief, which evaluates religious tenets on basis of evidence; and non-belief, which declares folk religion irrelevant. These findings bear on anthropological question of the new intellectualism, suggesting that both intellectualist position, which declares that people believe religious tenets literally, and anti-intellectualist position, which declares that religion is purely a metaphor for something else, are overly simple in that they do not consider individual variations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stevan Harrell (1977) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: