Key result
MANTA device linked to complete closure success and ~86% less major bleeding versus Prostar-XL.
Why the study?
Does a collagen-based vascular closure device (MANTA) reduce vascular and bleeding complications compared to suture-based closure in patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR?
Observational (n=346)
No
Does a collagen-based vascular closure device (MANTA) reduce vascular and bleeding complications compared to suture-based closure in patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR?
The use of a collagen-based vascular closure device (MANTA) for large caliber arteriotomy in TAVR is feasible and significantly reduces major bleeding compared to traditional suture-based closure.
MANTA device feasible for percutaneous TAVR closure in this cohort; leaves open comparative efficacy versus standard methods.
Objectives To evaluate the feasibility of fully percutaneous closure using a novel collagen‐based vascular closure device after transfemoral aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Background TAVR is utilized increasingly for the treatment of severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. Vascular complications related to access and closure dominate the adverse event profile of the procedure despite progressively reducing arteriotomy caliber. The advent of a novel collagen‐based device (MANTATM) and preliminary data suggest this could be used as a routine percutaneous closure device. Methods A prospective observational study of unselected consecutive patients undergoing TAVR in a single center. Data were collected via hospital electronic records and the SWEDEHEART registry. The primary clinical outcome was closure success and time to hemostasis. Secondary outcomes included VARC‐2 defined major and minor vascular and bleeding complications within 30 days using suture‐based closure with Prostar‐XL within the same center. Results A consecutive cohort of 346 patients underwent TAVR via the transfemoral approach. Vascular closure with MANTATM was successful in all with a mean time to hemostasis of 42 sec (SD 115.5, range 0–600). The composite of all‐cause mortality and major complications related to the main access site was similar between the groups (1.1% vs 1.9%, P = .61). Major bleeding occurred less frequently with MANTA TM (1.1% vs 7.8%, P = .02). Conclusion The novel use of a collagen‐based vascular closure device for large caliber arteriotomy is feasible in an unselected population undergoing transfemoral TAVR and appears efficacious compared to percutaneous suture‐based closure. These data should prompt larger studies to evaluate efficacy and safety.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Palma et al. (2018) conducted an observational in severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (n=346). MANTA device vs. Prostar-XL suture-based closure was evaluated on closure success and time to hemostasis. Percutaneous femoral arteriotomy closure using the MANTA device achieved 100% closure success and reduced major bleeding compared to Prostar-XL (1.1% vs 7.8%, P=0.02).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: