Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study offers an innovative battery thermal management system for electric vehicles (EV-BTMS) that uses R290 refrigerant with mass flow separation to regulate battery heating. In this work, the refrigerant flow has been split between a cabin condenser and an offset-strip-fin plate heat exchanger (OSF-PHE) to simplify system structure and enhance cold-start performance. It evaluates system stability under variable heat flux (q) which replicate real driving conditions, unlike earlier studies. The experiments were conducted at refrigerant saturation temperature (T sat ) of 55 °C, with variations in mass flux (G) of 30, 40 & 50 kg/m 2 s, inlet vapor quality (X inl ) of 0.1–0.9, and coolant flow rates of 1.5, 2.5 & 3.5 Liter Per Minute (LPM). The refrigerant-side heat transfer coefficient (h ref ) reached 8057.2 W/m 2 K at 1.5 LPM and G = 30 kg/m 2 s, while the maximum q enhanced to 25.18 kW/m 2 at 3.5 LPM and G = 50 kg/m 2 s. The OSF-PHE achieved a peak effectiveness (εPHE) of 0.81 at 1.5 LPM and G = 50 kg/m 2 s, with an Energy Performance Index (EPI) of 93.2 % and a frictional pressure drop (ΔP fri ) of 5.10 kPa. Moreover, the coolant flow analysis demonstrated that 1.5 LPM offers the highest thermal effectiveness but greater-pressure losses, 3.5 LPM improves heat transfer but reduces efficiency, and 2.5 LPM ensures stable and balanced thermal operation. Finally, thermal evaluation of a 200 Ah LiFePO₄ battery reveals significant heat generation of 25.18 kW/m 2 at 1C and highlighting the need for precise thermal management to ensure safe, efficient, and reliable operation of battery modules.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dhivagar et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: