Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In the present article I focus on discourses that contribute to making the syntagma life project meaningful to regulate the future of young people through moral education. In a theoretical- discursive and deconstructionist approach, based mainly on the notions of sedimentation and translation/supplementation, I argue that the discourse of the life project tries to establish the impossible social harmony, associated with neoliberal rationality articulated with ultraconservative demands. I argue that these records point to an impossible society without antagonisms and suffering in a future to be programmed. I conclude by defending the importance of leaving the future to the future-to-come and questioning the normativity of the high school curriculum proposal through the life project curriculum component.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alice Casimiro Lopes (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: