Key result
MR molecular imaging contrast agents detect specific atherosclerotic markers to differentiate stable from unstable plaques.
Why the study?
Can magnetic resonance molecular imaging contrast agents detect specific markers in atherosclerotic plaques?
Can magnetic resonance molecular imaging contrast agents detect specific markers in atherosclerotic plaques?
Magnetic resonance molecular imaging contrast agents offer a promising approach to detect specific markers of atherosclerosis and differentiate between stable and unstable plaques in vivo.
Heart disease is the most prevalent cause of mortality in the Western world and is most frequently caused by rupture of lesions in the arteries, which are formed by atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis is a progressive disease, and therefore, there is a strong motivation to be able to image the stages of this disease in vivo. The pathogenesis of this disease is now well established, and a number of markers such as macrophages, vascular adhesion molecules, fibrin, and the alphanubeta3-integrin have been identified that are of particular interest for imaging. Furthermore, the differentiation between the stable and unstable plaque with imaging is a central goal of the field. Contrast can be generated in magnetic resonance imaging through the application of several types of agents such as T1, T2, chemical exchange saturation transfer or 19F-based imaging agents. Subsequent to the discussion of the above topics, we will describe some examples of molecular imaging agents that successfully detect specific markers in atherosclerotic plaques that are of interest in several stages of this disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mulder et al. (2007) conducted a review in Atherosclerosis. Magnetic resonance molecular imaging contrast agents was evaluated. Magnetic resonance molecular imaging contrast agents can successfully detect specific markers in atherosclerotic plaques, aiding in the differentiation between stable and unstable plaques.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: