Purpose: To evaluate the performance of the anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS‐OCT) and Scheimpflug–Placido tomographic (SPT) indices in differentiating suspect keratoconus (SKC) from normal (N). Methods: In this cross‐sectional study, one eye of each patient was scanned on AS‐OCT and SPT. Following, 5 regression analysis models were developed: Model 1: combined AS‐OCT corneal thickness (CT); Model 2: combined AS‐OCT epithelial thickness (ET); Model 3: Models 1 + 2; Model 4: SPT indices (symmetry index front [SIf], symmetry index back [SIb], keratoconus vertex back [KVb], and minimum CT [ThkMin]); Model 5: Models 3 + 4. The areas under the curve (AUC) of receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were compared across groups to estimate their performance accuracy. Results: Two hundred and five N eyes, 56 SKC eyes, and 89 keratoconus (KC) eyes were scanned with AS‐OCT and SPT. For Models 1 and 2, no individual metric yielded an AUC > 0.84. For Model 3, the AUC was 0.96 (R2 Nagelkerke: 0.69) with 90.28% cases correctly identified as SKC. For Model 4, the AUC was 0.99 (R2 Nagelkerke: 0.87), with 95.58% of cases correctly classified as SKC. For Model 5, the diagnostic accuracy did not improve compared to Model 4. Conclusion: Both combined AS‐OCT indices and combined SPT indices provided excellent diagnostic power to differentiate SKC from N eyes. The combined SPT model showed a superior value compared to the AS‐OCT model. Furthermore, combined AS‐OCT and SPT data did not perform better than the combined SPT data alone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Salman et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: