This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
OBJECTIVE: To develop a transmission dynamics model for brucellosis in Hubei Province and evaluate non-vaccination control strategies. METHODS: We constructed a SsIs-W-ShEhIhCh(Susceptible sheep - Infected sheep - Environmental bacterial load - Susceptible humans - Exposed humans - Acute infected humans - Chronic infected humans) transmission dynamics model and assessed disease transmissibility through R0 calculation. Four intervention measures (environmental disinfection, improved diagnosis, personal protection, and infected sheep management) were evaluated independently and in combination. RESULTS: Model fitting showed high consistency with reported cases (R²=0.884, p > 0.999). Disease transmission exhibited three phases: high incidence (2014–2016, R0 = 1.86), decline (2020, R0 = 0.69), and rebound (2023 R0 = 1.76). Direct transmission (sheep-to-human) was the primary driver (78.6%-91.5% of R0). Among single interventions, personal protection yielded the greatest case reduction (93.51% case reduction), followed by infected sheep management (91.02%). The combination of these two measures achieved optimal effectiveness (95.98% case reduction). CONCLUSION: Brucellosis transmission in Hubei Province is predominantly driven by direct transmission. Comprehensive control strategies should prioritize personal protection and infected sheep management, supplemented by environmental disinfection and improved diagnosis. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abudunaibi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: