Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
AIMS: To investigate the efficacy and safety of intravitreal Dexamethasone implant (DEX-I) therapy in the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME) refractory to intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB). MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective and cross-sectional study included 37 eyes of 37 patients who received 3 loading doses of IVB injections for DME with no response and underwent DEX-I implant. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements and central foveal thickness (CFT) measured by spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) were recorded and compared before DEX-I, at the first week, first, second, third and sixth months. Duration of DME, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels, DME types and lens status (phakic, pseudophakic) were also recorded. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 61.14 ±8.69 years (59.5% male, 40.5% female). 35.1% of the patients had cystoid macular edema, 64.9% had diffuse macular edema and 73 % were phakic and 27% were pseudophakic. BCVA, CFT and IOP values before DEX-I injection were 0.78 ±0.16 LogMAR, 493.73 ±107.6 µm and 13.05 ±2.59 mmHg, respectively. At 6 months after DEX-I, BCVA, CFT and IOP values were 0.64 ±0.11 LogMAR, 397.35 ±59.72 µm and 16.3 ±2.51 mmHg, respectively. In all follow-ups, there was a significant improvement in BCVA, a significant decrease in CFT and a significant increase in IOP compared to pre-injection. Ocular hypertension was observed in 0.8 % of patients and progression of cataract progression in 1% of patients after treatment. CONCLUSION: DEX-I therapy is an effective and safe treatment option for DME refractory to IVB treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Berhuni et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: