Key result
TCV-309 fails to improve survival over placebo but reduces the percentage of failed organs.
Why the study?
Does TCV-309 reduce morbidity and mortality in patients with severe SIRS and septic shock?
RCT (n=98)
Double-blind
randomized
Yes
Does TCV-309 reduce morbidity and mortality in patients with severe SIRS and septic shock?
In patients with septic shock, the platelet-activating factor antagonist TCV-309 did not improve 56-day mortality but significantly reduced organ dysfunction and the need for supportive therapies.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Does not support TCV-309 for survival in septic shock; challenges PAF antagonism as a strategy while leaving organ-failure endpoints open for targeted trials.
Sepsis and organ failure remain the main cause of death on the ICU. Sepsis is characterized by a severe inflammatory response, in which platelet-activating factor (PAF) is considered to play an important role. This study investigated whether treatment with the PAF-antagonist TCV-309 reduces morbidity and mortality in patients with septic shock. The study was conducted as a double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled multicenter study. The included patients had to fulfill the SIRS criteria with a clinical suspicion of infection, an admission APACHE II score greater than 15, and shock, defined as a mean arterial pressure <70 mmHg and/or a decrease > or =40 mmHg despite adequate fluid resuscitation. Patients received 1.0 mg/kg TCV-309 or placebo, twice daily, intravenously during 14 days. The prospectively set goals were MOF score, recovery from shock, mortality, and assessment of the safety of the medication. A total of 98 patients were included of which 97 were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. The overall survival at day 56 of TCV-309 treated patients was similar compared to placebo treated patients (51.0% vs. 41.7%, P = 0.47). In contrast, the mean percentage of failed organs per patient present after 14 days in the TCV-309 treated patients was significantly lower compared to the placebo treated patients (11.9% vs. 25.1%, P = 0.04), leading to a reduced need for vasopressors, dialysis, and ventilatory support. Furthermore, the mean APACHE-II score during treatment with TCV-309 was significantly lower and the number of patients recovered from shock after day 14 was significantly higher in the TCV-309 treated patient group (2/32 vs. 9/29, P = 0.01). The number of adverse events was not significantly different between the TCV-309 and placebo treated patients. TCV-309 did not change overall mortality of septic shock, however a substantial reduction in organ dysfunction and morbidity, frequently associated with septic shock was achieved, without significant adverse events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Poeze et al. (2000) conducted an RCT in Severe SIRS and septic shock (n=98). TCV-309 vs. placebo was evaluated on Overall survival at day 56 (p=0.47). TCV-309 did not significantly improve overall survival at day 56 compared to placebo (51.0% vs. 41.7%, P=0.47), but significantly reduced the mean percentage of failed organs (11.9% vs. 25.1%, P=0.04).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: