Key result
Indexed aortic annulus diameter linked to ~12-fold higher odds of moderate-to-severe aortic wall abnormalities.
Why the study?
Do clinical and echocardiographic findings predict histological abnormalities of the aortic wall in patients with bicuspid aortic valve undergoing aortic surgery?
Population
127 patients with bicuspid aortic valve and a wide spectrum of valvar disease who underwent replacement of…
Design
Cohort
Authors
Loading...
Indexed annulus diameter may flag wall abnormalities in bicuspid valve surgery; leaves open prospective validation for risk stratification.
Cohort (n=127)
Do clinical and echocardiographic findings predict histological abnormalities of the aortic wall in patients with bicuspid aortic valve undergoing aortic surgery?
Odds Ratio: 12.22 (95% CI 1.65–90.38)
p-value: p=0.014
A high proportion of patients with bicuspid aortic valve and mild to moderate aortic dilatation have severe histological abnormalities of the aortic wall that are not predictable by standard clinical and echocardiographic findings, highlighting the need for better risk stratification tools.
Leone et al. (2011) conducted a cohort in Bicuspid aortic valve (n=127). Indexed diameter of the aortic annulus was evaluated on Moderate/severe (grade 2-3) histological alterations of the aortic wall (OR 12.22, 95% CI 1.65-90.38, p=0.014). The indexed diameter of the aortic annulus was significantly associated with moderate to severe histological abnormalities of the aortic wall (OR 12.22; 95% CI 1.65-90.38; p=0.014).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: