Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The photophysical properties of 2,2′- and 4,4′-biphenyldiols were investigated in aqueous and various organic solvents using optical absorption, steady-state and time-resolved fluorescence measurements. The investigated properties were correlated with the prototropic equilibria between the neutral, monoanionic and dianionic forms of the biphenyldiols. The monoanionic form of 2,2′-biphenyldiol is found to be exceptionally stable and shows interesting solvatochromism in polar protic and aprotic solvents. In solvents having appreciable proton-accepting power, 2,2′-biphenyldiol undergoes deprotonation, causing the coexistence of both the neutral and monoanionic forms in solutions. In presence of a strong proton acceptor, e.g. triethylamine, 2,2′-biphenyldiol undergoes complete deprotonation in a polar solvent like acetonitrile. In a nonpolar solvent, like cyclohexane, however, 2,2′-biphenyldiol forms ground-state intermolecularly hydrogen bonded complex with triethylamine. The photophysical properties of 2,2′-biphenyldiol have been found to be drastically different from those of 4,4′-biphenyldiol. The differences are explained on the basis of the presence and absence of intramolecular hydrogen bonding in the two compounds.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mohanty et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: