Key result
TRR, VSRR, and PEARS offer distinct trade-offs in risk and anatomical conservation for Marfan syndrome.
This review emphasizes the need to carefully balance the net benefit and harm of different surgical options for prophylactic aortic root replacement in young patients with Marfan syndrome.
Emphasizes individualized risk-benefit assessment for aortic root surgery in Marfan syndrome; leaves open definitive comparative data from randomized trials.
Elective root replacement in Marfan syndrome has improved life expectancy in affected patients. Three forms of surgery are now available: total root replacement (TRR) with a valved conduit, valve sparing root replacement (VSRR) and personalised external aortic root support (PEARS) with a macroporous mesh sleeve. TRR can be performed irrespective of aortic dimensions and a mechanical replacement valve is a secure and near certain means of correcting aortic valve regurgitation but has thromboembolic and bleeding risks. VSRR offers freedom from anticoagulation and attendant risks of bleeding but reoperation for aortic regurgitation runs at 1.3% per annum. A prospective multi-institutional study has found this to be an underestimate of the true rate of valve-related adverse events. PEARS conserves the aortic root anatomy and optimises the chance of maintaining valve function but average follow-up is under 5 years and so the long-term results are yet to be determined. Patients are on average in their 30s and so the cumulative lifetime need for reoperation, and of any valve-related complications, are consequently substantial. With lowering surgical risk of prophylactic root replacement, the threshold for intervention has reduced progressively over 30 years to 4.5 cm and so an increasing number of patients who are not destined to have a dissection are now having root replacement. In evaluation of these three forms of surgery, the number needed to treat to prevent dissection and the balance of net benefit and harm in future patients must be considered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Treasure et al. (2014) conducted a review in Marfan syndrome and other congenital disorders associated with aortic root aneurysms. Surgical management (Total root replacement, Valve sparing root replacement, Personalised external aortic root support) was evaluated. Total root replacement, valve sparing root replacement, and personalised external aortic root support offer different balances of thromboembolic risks, reoperation rates, and anatomical conservation for patients with Marfan syndrome.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: