Shedding light on the lamellarins: Structural determinants for potent cytotoxic activity toward various cancer cell lines were systematically investigated to establish SARs for the marine alkaloids in the lamellarin family. The C5C6 double bond ensures not only the planarity of the D‐ring, but also proper alignment of the substituents on the E‐ring with their respective moieties of the target. The importance of the C7 OH group is also revealed for the first time. magnified image Twenty‐two naturally occurring and three unnatural lamellarins were synthesized and evaluated for their cytotoxicities against cancer cells. Across eleven cancer cell lines derived from six different cancer types, the IC50 values of these compounds ranged from sub‐nanomolar (0.08 nM) to micromolar (>97.0 μM). About one‐fourth (6/25) and one‐half (11/25) of these lamellarins are more potent than the positive control, etoposide, against at least six different cell lines and three different cell types, respectively. In general, lamellarins D, X, ε, M, N, and dehydrolamellarin J are significantly more potent than the other lamellarins. The IC50 values were used to perform structure–activity relationship (SAR) studies by comparing the cytotoxic activities of several pairs of lamellarin structures that differ in selected substitution patterns. Our results not only reveal the importance of specific hydroxylation or methoxylation patterns for the first time, but also confirm prior findings and clarify some previous uncertainties.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chittchang et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: