Key result
Segmental antral ablation shows no difference in 12-month freedom from AF versus circumferential ablation.
Why the study?
Does segmental antral ablation reduce procedure time without increasing AF recurrence compared to circumferential antral ablation in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation?
RCT (n=119)
Does segmental antral ablation reduce procedure time without increasing AF recurrence compared to circumferential antral ablation in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation?
A segmental approach to pulmonary vein isolation does not reduce procedure time and results in unacceptably high rates of recovered antral sites compared to a full circumferential approach.
Segmental antral ablation confers no efficacy or procedural advantage; reinforces circumferential ablation as standard for pulmonary vein isolation.
BACKGROUND: A full circumferential set of antral lesions is not always required for bidirectional pulmonary vein conduction block. It is unknown whether a partial lesion set that isolates the veins will have clinical success rates similar to a full circumferential lesion set, and if procedural times or procedural risk will be affected. METHODS: We performed a prospective, randomized clinical trial to test the hypothesis that a partial lesion set that isolates the pulmonary veins has comparable clinical success rate and shorter procedure times compared to a strategy of completing the circumferential lesion set once the veins are isolated. RESULTS: A total of 119 patients were enrolled, 59 randomized to circumferential ablation, and 60 to segmental. Mean age was 58.3 ± 10.1, 77% male. Mean procedure time was 221.0 ± 46.9 minutes in circumferential and 224.7 ± 51.3 in segmental (P = 0.68). Twelve-month freedom from AF recurrence was 61.3% overall, 64.4% in circumferential, and 58.3% in segmental (P = 0.50). Among 25 segmental patients with AF recurrence, 23 underwent second ablation. Among 33 areas of conduction recovery, 23 (70%) occurred in segments ablated at first procedure and 10 (30%) in segments not previously ablated, suggesting reversible conduction block from edema. CONCLUSION: No difference in AF recurrence or procedure time is detectable in a sample of 119 patients randomized to segmental or circumferential antral ablation to achieve pulmonary vein isolation. Second ablation procedures confirmed that some antral sites do not require ablation. A segmental approach results in unacceptably high rates of untargeted or recovered antral sites to make this approach feasible.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gula et al. (2015) conducted an RCT in Atrial fibrillation (n=119). Segmental antral ablation vs. Circumferential antral ablation was evaluated on 12-month freedom from AF recurrence (p=0.50). Segmental antral ablation for pulmonary vein isolation showed no significant difference in 12-month freedom from AF recurrence compared to circumferential ablation (58.3% vs 64.4%; P=0.50).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: