Prevalence, risk factors and outcome of hyperlactataemia in HIV‐infected patients*

OBJECTIVE: We describe the prevalence, risk factors and outcome of hyperlactataemia (HL) in a cohort of 140 HIV-infected patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were enrolled consecutively within a 3-month period (July to September 1999) and followed until 31 October 2000. One hundred and forty HIV-infected patients had venous plasma lactate levels measured. HL was defined at baseline by two consecutive lactate levels > 2.1 mmol/L (upper limit of normal). We compared baseline demographic characteristics, immuno-virological parameters, antiretroviral therapy and outcome between patients with HL (cases) or without HL (controls). We described the clinical features of patients with HL. RESULTS: Among 129 patients included in the analysis, HL was found in 11 patients (8.5%), all of whom were receiving nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs). Cases were more likely than controls to receive didanosine or stavudine (82% vs. 19%, P= 2.7 x 10(-6) and 82% vs. 48%, P= 0.03, respectively). Only 4/11 cases (36%) had symptoms consistent with HL. After a median follow-up of 15 months, lactate level returned to normal in all three patients who discontinued NRTIs, but in only 2/8 patients who did not (P = 0.06). Only one case experienced lactic acidosis and died during follow-up. Mortality rate was similar in cases and controls. CONCLUSION: HL is associated with NRTI use, in particular didanosine and stavudine, and discontinuation of NRTIs seems to be associated with rapid resolution of HL. Lactic acidosis remains rare and the long-term outcome of patients with HL does not seem to be poorer than controls.