Background It has been suggested that a lower pre-highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) CD4 count nadir may lead to a greater risk of experiencing HAART-related toxicity. We investigated the relationship between the pre-HAART CD4 count nadir, HAART and the occurrence of laboratory-defined toxicities. Methods Previously antiretroviral-naive individuals starting HAART at the Royal Free Hospital, London, UK, were included. Drug discontinuation, increases in total cholesterol (by >1mmol/l), alanine aspartate transferase/ alanine aminotransferase (AST/ALT) (by >2.5 times the upper limit of normal), bilirubin (by >2.5 times the upper limit of normal), triglycerides (by >1 mmol/l) and decreases in haemoglobin (by >2 g/dl) were assessed. Results 377/847 (45%) individuals starting HAART stopped at least one antiretroviral within the first 48 weeks. Lower CD4 nadirs were not associated with a greater rate of discontinuing antiretrovirals (adjusted hazard ratio (HR)=1.04 per 100 cells/mm 3 higher; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.99–1.10; P=0.15). 70/297 (24%), 39/192 (20%) and 73/358 (20%) with a CD4 cell nadir of 0–100, 100–200 and 200+ cells/mm 3 , respectively, stopped for toxicity reasons; 11/297 (4%), 5/192 (3%) and 3/358 (1%) stopped for reasons of insufficient efficacy; 63/297 (21%), 33/192 (17%) and 80/358 (22%) stopped for other reasons ( P=0.1). Reasons for stopping were similar between CD4 nadir groups. Lower CD4 nadirs were not associated with an increased risk of hypercholesterolaemia, anaemia, hypertriglyceridaemia or increases in AST/ALT but were associated with increased incidence of hyperbilirubinaemia (HR=0.67 per 100 cells/mm 3 higher; 95% CI 0.49–0.92; P=0.01). Discussion Lower CD4 nadirs were not found to be associated either with discontinuing an antiretroviral or with a higher risk of toxicity, except for an increased risk of experiencing an increase in bilirubin levels.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Smith et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: