Key result
Echo-fluoroscopy fusion imaging during LAAC is linked to a ~5-minute reduction in transseptal puncture time.
Why the study?
Real-time echocardiography-fluoroscopy fusion imaging allows intuitive anatomical spatial orientation during structural interventions, but its safety and efficacy during percutaneous left atrial appendage closure needed assessment.
Does real-time echocardiography-fluoroscopy fusion imaging improve procedural efficacy and safety in patients undergoing left atrial appendage closure?
Cohort (n=155)
No
Does real-time echocardiography-fluoroscopy fusion imaging improve procedural efficacy and safety in patients undergoing left atrial appendage closure?
Absolute Event Rate: 17% vs 22%
p-value: p=0.001
Real-time echocardiography-fluoroscopy fusion imaging during LAAC improves procedural efficiency by reducing procedure time, transseptal puncture time, and contrast use without compromising safety.
May expedite transseptal access in LAA closure; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
Background Real-time echocardiography-fluoroscopy fusion imaging (FI) merges real-time echocardiographic imaging with fluoroscopic images allowing intuitive anatomical spatial orientation during structural heart disease interventions. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of FI during percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC).Methods 34 consecutive patients before (–FI) and 121 patients after (+FI) the introduction of FI for LAAC were included in a single-centre study. In-hospital safety parameters were analysed according to adverse event (AE) definition of the Munich consensus document and procedure-related parameters were assessed for efficacy. An ANCOVA was performed to investigate the influence of a learning curve.Results Time until successful transseptal puncture was significantly reduced as well as total procedure time and the amount of contrast agent used (+FI/–FI:17 ± 6.35 min vs. 22 ± 8.33 min, p = 0.001; +FI/–FI: 50 min IQR 43 min − 60 min vs. 57 min IQR 45 min −70 min; p = 0.013; +FI/–FI: 70 mL, IQR 55 ml–90 mL vs. 152 mL, IQR 107 mL − 205 mL; p < 0.001). However, fluoroscopy time and dose-area product did not differ between both groups. There was no significant difference in the occurrence of in-hospital adverse events (+FI/–FI: 2.5% vs. 0%; p = 0.596). The ANCOVA revealed that the learning curve does not affect procedural efficacy parameters such as procedure time, time to transseptal puncture, amount of contrast agent and dose-area product.Conclusions FI for LAAC reduces the total procedure time, the time to successful transseptal puncture and periprocedural amount of contrast agent.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Afzal et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Left atrial appendage closure (n=155). Real-time echocardiography-fluoroscopy fusion imaging vs. Standard imaging without fusion was evaluated on Time until successful transseptal puncture (p=0.001). Real-time echocardiography-fluoroscopy fusion imaging during left atrial appendage closure significantly reduced time to successful transseptal puncture (17 vs 22 min, p=0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: