Key result
0% of permanent AF patients in general practice meet all guideline recommendations.
Why the study?
The study aimed to develop and test a quality of care score for patients with permanent AF in general practice and identify patterns of care.
What is the quality of care for patients with permanent atrial fibrillation in Irish general practice when assessed using the MAGIC score?
Cross-Sectional (n=153)
Yes
What is the quality of care for patients with permanent atrial fibrillation in Irish general practice when assessed using the MAGIC score?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A novel 14-point quality of care score (MAGIC) demonstrates that management of atrial fibrillation in Irish general practice often falls short of full guideline recommendations, particularly regarding creatinine clearance, HAS-BLED scoring, and correct oral anticoagulation dosing.
Aim The aim of this pilot study is to develop and test a quality of care score for patients with permanent atrial fibrillation (AF) in general practice, and identify the patterns of quality of care using this score. We developed a quality of care score based on the Atrial Fibrillation Better Care pathway recommended by the European Society of Cardiology and the European Heart Rhythm Association guidelines. This is a 14-point score that we have termed the MAGIC score(Management of Atrial Fibrillation in Integrated Care and General Practice). Methods & Results An observational cross-sectional pilot study was undertaken. Proportionate sampling was used across 11 practices from the Ireland East practice-based research network. The GPs completed a report form on each patient provided by the research team by undertaking a retrospective chart review. 11 practices participated with a total number of 1855 patients with AF. We received data on 153 patients. The main findings were that: No patient met all 14 guideline based recommendations Mean MAGIC score was 11.3 Points were most commonly deducted because the creatinine-clearance and HAS-BLED score were not recorded and the patient was not on the correct dose of oral anti-coagulation. Conclusion This study demonstrates the feasibility of using a quality of care score to measure quality of AF management in general practice. This scoring system; which is based on internationally recognised quality of care markers, highlights key areas that can be targeted with intervention to improve care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McErlean et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Permanent atrial fibrillation (n=153). Quality of care assessment (MAGIC score) was evaluated on Mean MAGIC score (out of 14 guideline-based recommendations). In a pilot study of 153 patients with permanent atrial fibrillation in Irish general practice, no patient met all 14 guideline-based recommendations, with a mean MAGIC quality of care score of 11.3.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: