Key result
Perceval suture-less valves linked to transiently ~45% lower day-3 platelets versus Magna without adverse clinical outcomes.
Why the study?
Thrombocytopenia has been reported after Perceval suture-less aortic valve implantation, but its time course, platelet recovery, and effect on postoperative outcomes were unknown.
Does Perceval suture-less aortic valve implantation cause clinically significant thrombocytopenia compared to sutured valves in patients undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement?
Cohort (n=70)
No
Does Perceval suture-less aortic valve implantation cause clinically significant thrombocytopenia compared to sutured valves in patients undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement?
Absolute Event Rate: 69.6% vs 126.2%
p-value: p=0.001
Thrombocytopenia following Perceval suture-less aortic valve implantation is a transient phenomenon that does not adversely affect short-term post-operative clinical outcomes.
Transient thrombocytopenia with Perceval does not affect short-term outcomes; leaves open need for randomized confirmation of platelet effects.
Objectives: Thrombocytopenia has been reported following implantation of Perceval suture-less aortic valve. However, the time course of thrombocytopenia and platelet recovery is unknown. In addition, the effect of thrombocytopenia on post-operative outcome is unknown. We sought to study this observation and correlate that with short-term outcome. Methods: This is a retrospective review of a prospectively collected database over a 3-year period of all isolated aortic valve replacements (70 patients) using bioprosthetic valves (sutured Magna and suture-less Perceval). All preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative variables were collected and analyzed. Platelets count and mean platelet volumes were collected and analyzed in respect to the type of valve used and their time course. Results: The cohort consisted of 70 consecutive patients of which 42 underwent Perceval suture-less valve (group Perceval) and 28 underwent bioprosthetic sutured valve (group Magna). There was no difference in platelets count and mean platelet volume at baseline. However, Perceval group had significant drop in platelet count from day 1 to day 3 post-operatively, followed by a gradual increase in platelet count until discharge. Mean platelet volume, however, was not different between the two types of valves. Postoperative outcomes were similar in the two groups with exception of intensive care and a hospital stay which were significantly shorter in Perceval group. Conclusion: Thrombocytopenia following Perceval suture-less valve is observed from day 1 postoperatively and it is a transient phenomenon. It does not correlate with worse clinical outcomes postoperatively. Larger studies are needed to elucidate the mechanism and its impact.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Al-Sarraf et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Isolated aortic valve replacement (n=70). Perceval suture-less aortic valve vs. Magna bioprosthetic sutured valve was evaluated on Platelet count on day 3 post-operatively (x 10^9/L) (p=0.001). Perceval suture-less aortic valve implantation was associated with a significant but transient decrease in platelet count by day 3 post-operatively compared to Magna sutured valves, with no adverse effect on clinical outcomes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: