SummaryGrowth of leaves, wood, and stems were studied over an entire growing season on four year old peach (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch.) trees having no crop, commercial crop loads, or heavy crop loads. Leaf, wood, and stem growth were reduced on cropping trees relative to defruited trees. The presence of fruit reduced leaf biomass growth during Stage I and II of fruit growth but not thereafter. Wood biomass growth was reduced by the presence of fruit during all stages of fruit growth. Stem biomass growth was most strongly affected by fruit during Stage III of fruit growth. Carbon partitioning to stems appeared to be influenced by both fruit sink demands and set developmental capacity for secondary radial growth. Total above-ground biomass production was similar in all three treatments, despite significantly greater leaf area in defruited trees. The total carbohydrate cost of the above ground biomass (the sum of biomass costs, calculated growth and maintenance respiration costs) was estimated to be similar for all three treatments. Cropping reduced root starch content and flowering density but did not influence percent fruit set during the subsequent growing season relative to non-cropped trees.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Berman et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: