Textile wet-processing generates wastewater containing salts, dyes, organic pollutants, and heavy metals. This study evaluated treated textile effluents using a combined approach based on physicochemical parameters, heavy metal concentrations, pollution indices, and dissolved organic matter (DOM) optical characteristics. Eleven final-effluent samples were collected from textile factories in major industrial areas of Bangladesh. The average pH (7.60 ± 0.37), dissolved oxygen (6.95 ± 1.29 mg/L), and biochemical oxygen demand (19.09 ± 4.74 mg/L) were generally within permissible limits. In contrast, total dissolved solids (1553.27 ± 1042.17 mg/L), chemical oxygen demand (207.90 ± 348.20 mg/L), and conductivity (2318 ± 1554.97 μS/cm) exceeded several national and international discharge standards. Heavy metals followed the order Fe > Ag > Mn > Cu > Cr > Ni > Li. Pollution indices identified F-05, F-06, and F-11 as important contamination hotspots, while F-06 and F-11 showed the highest metal-related risk. DOM fluorescence also showed clear differences among factories, reflecting variations in treatment conditions and industrial inputs. The combined analysis helped distinguish salt-rich, metal-rich, and DOM-dominated residual effluent profiles. Spearman correlation analysis showed strong positive relationships among TDS, conductivity, and salinity (ρ ≥ 0.998, q < 0.001), while HIX and BIX were strongly negatively correlated (ρ = −0.918, q = 0.002). These patterns show that residual pollution was not controlled by a single water-quality parameter alone. The results show that textile effluent quality varied considerably among factories, highlighting the need for site-specific ETP improvement, better monitoring, and targeted control of salts, organic matter, and metals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Haque et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: