Key result
RASi use linked to ~40% lower mortality risk in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.
Why the study?
Does renin-angiotensin system inhibitor (RASi) treatment improve overall survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma?
Cohort (n=232)
Yes
Does renin-angiotensin system inhibitor (RASi) treatment improve overall survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma?
Hazard Ratio: 0.6 (95% CI 0.4–0.9)
Absolute Event Rate: 11.9% vs 6.8%
p-value: p=0.011
The use of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors is associated with significantly longer overall survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, particularly when combined with sorafenib.
RASi use was associated with longer survival in Child-Pugh A HCC; leaves open whether randomized trials should test addition to sorafenib.
BackgroundInhibition of the renin–angiotensin system (RAS) was associated with longer survival in patients with different solid malignancies. ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to investigate the effect of RAS inhibitor (RASi) treatment (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin-II-receptor blockers) on survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MethodsPatients diagnosed with HCC and Child-Pugh A between 1992 and 2013 who received sorafenib, experimental therapy, or best supportive care were eligible for the Vienna cohort. The Mainz cohort included patients with HCC and Child-Pugh A who received sorafenib treatment between 2007 and 2016. The association between RASi and overall survival (OS) was evaluated in univariate and multivariate analyses. ResultsIn the Vienna cohort, 43 of 156 patients received RASi for hypertension. RASi treatment was associated with longer OS (11.9 vs. 6.8 months (mo); p = 0.014) and remained a significant prognostic factor upon multivariate analysis (HR = 0.6; 95% CI 0.4–0.9; p = 0.011). In subgroup analysis, patients treated with sorafenib plus RASi had better median OS (19.5 mo) compared to those treated with either sorafenib (10.9 mo) or RASi (9.7 mo) alone (p = 0.043). The beneficial effect of RASi on survival was confirmed in the Mainz cohort (n = 76).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pinter et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in Hepatocellular carcinoma (n=232). RAS inhibitor (RASi) treatment vs. No RAS inhibitor treatment was evaluated on Overall survival (OS) (HR 0.6, 95% CI 0.4-0.9, p=0.011). RAS inhibitor treatment was associated with longer overall survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (11.9 vs. 6.8 months; HR 0.6; 95% CI 0.4-0.9; p=0.011).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: