Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We study the ionic Hubbard model at temperature $T=0$ within the mean-field approximation, and show that the charge gap does not close completely at the ionic-band insulator to antiferromagnetic insulator transition, contrary to previous expectations. Furthermore, we find an intermediate phase for on-site repulsions U>Uc for different lattices, and calculate the phase diagram for the ionic Hubbard model with alternating U, corresponding to a Cu-O lattice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Požgajčić et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: