Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Formulation development aims at finding the most stabilizing conditions for a particular therapeutic protein molecule. Typically, various combinations of buffer type, pH, and additional excipients are experimentally tested at different concentrations in a laborious process to identify a suitable formulation. It is therefore tempting to use a platform approach and apply previously successful formulations to similar proteins, particularly for monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), which typically only differ in their antigen-binding region. Such a platform approach comes with the risk that the protein is insufficiently stable in the platform formulation to be suitable for first-in-human studies. Formulatability assessment closes a gap between discovery and pre-clinical formulation development by taking the protein's physicochemical stability and formulation conditions into consideration. The evaluation of a protein candidate's biophysical properties during formulatability assessment provides data to facilitate the decision as to whether the molecule may be suitable for a platform formulation, or if an extended pre-formulation screening is required in order to identify conditions that promote conformational, colloidal, or chemical stability of the protein. We discuss how formulation scientists can put a risk-based mAb platform formulation approach into practice, including formulatability assessment, systematic pre-formulation and storage stability studies with platform analytical methods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Menzen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: