Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study presents a follow-up analysis of 22,427 injury cases drawn from the California Regional Trauma Registry. Whereas the earlier analysis developed a surrogate for alcohol-involved injuries using E-codes as reflective of injury type, this analysis explores the possibility of using ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes that have a longer history and are available in more jurisdictions. Findings reported herein indicate that the original demographic patterns predicting testing and alcohol involvement patterns were maintained in ICD-9-CM diagnostic code-based models. Moreover, although variables representing demographic background, time of day, and day of week clearly were the most powerful model predictors, ICD-9-CM diagnostic codes reflecting physician assessment that the patient had a chronic alcohol problem did improve the fit of models, and thus provide additional information concerning testing and blood alcohol concentration patterns. In contrast, ICD-9-CM diagnostic codes reflecting the specific nature of the injury, although statistically significant, explained little additional variability in alcohol involvement. Nevertheless, the overall model did accurately classify approximately 75% of those in the sample for whom blood alcohol concentration status information was available, suggesting its appropriateness for surrogate development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Treno et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: