Increased interest in the management and conservation of gars (family Lepisosteidae) has resulted in the need to identify individual fish in wild and hatchery stocks; however, tagging methods have not been evaluated for these species. We estimated tag retention for passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags, T-bar anchor tags (Floy), and coded wire tags in alligator gar Atractosteus spatula, longnose gar Lepisosteus osseus, and spotted gar L. oculatus. Tag retention up to 876 d was similar across species for all tag types and tagging locations. Retention exceeded 98% for PIT tags injected into the muscle at the base of the dorsal fin and did not decrease with days posttagging. Retention was 97% for coded wire tags injected into the muscle at the base of the pectoral and anal fins. Retention of T-bar anchor tags was ≥ 97% through 500 d posttagging; however, T-bar anchor tag retention declined after 500 d and tags became difficult to read. The high retention of the tags evaluated in this study provides biologists with a variety of options for tagging lepisosteids in future management, conservation, and research. Received February 3, 2012; accepted March 15, 2012
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Buckmeier et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: