This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
This study sought to investigate the effect of two traditional processing methods (roasting and hotwater treatment) of African pear ( Dacryodes edulis [G. Don] H.J. Lam. [Burseraceae]) on the phenolic content, antioxidant properties and inhibition of two carbohydrate hydrolysing enzymes relevant to type 2 diabetes management (α-glucosidase and α-amylase). Some African pear samples were roasted for 5 min, while some were treated in hot water for 5 min. Thereafter, the total phenolic and flavonoid content, antioxidant activities, and interaction of the raw and processed samples with α-amylase and α-glucosidase were determined. The results of the total phenol and flavonoid contents of the raw, hot-water-treated and roasted African pear samples revealed that the roasted samples had significantly ( p <0.05) higher total phenol (22.4 mg/g) and flavonoid (3.14 mg/g) content than hot-water-treated (total phenol [16.2 mg/g], total flavonoid [2.32 mg/g]) and raw samples (total phenol [12.1 mg/g], total flavonoid [1.91 mg/g]). The roasted samples had the highest radical-scavenging and Fe 2+ -chelating abilities, as well as inhibition of Fe 2+ -induced lipid peroxidation in rat pancreas in vitro ; the raw samples had the least. Similarly, the samples inhibited both α-amylase and α-glucosidase activities in a dose-dependent manner; however, the processed samples had significantly higher inhibition of α-amylase and α-glucosidase activities than the raw samples. The higher phenolic content, antioxidant properties and inhibition of key enzymes (α- amylase and α-glucosidase) linked with type 2 diabetes in the roasted samples show that this is a better processing method for African pear than hot-water treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oboh et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: