Key result
Ca2+ yields ~8-fold stronger binding between cTnI and cTnC compared to Mg2+.
Effect estimate: 8-fold stronger
The C-terminal domain of cardiac troponin C plays a major role in binding troponin I, with an 8-fold stronger interaction in the presence of Ca2+ compared to Mg2+, suggesting a modulatory role in cardiac muscle regulation.
Highlights potential Ca2+-dependent troponin modulation in vitro; leaves open relevance to in vivo cardiac regulation.
The interactions between troponin I and troponin C are central to the Ca(2+)-regulated control of striated muscle. Using isothermal titration microcalorimetry we have studied the binding of human cardiac troponin C (cTnC) and its isolated domains to human cardiac troponin I (cTnI). We provide the first binding data for these proteins while they are free in solution and unmodified by reporter groups. Our data reveal that the C-terminal domain of cTnC is responsible for most of the free energy change upon cTnC.cTnI binding. Importantly, the interaction between cTnI and the C-terminal domain of cTnC is 8-fold stronger in the presence of Ca(2+) than in the presence of Mg(2+), suggesting that the C-terminal domain of cTnC may play a modulatory role in cardiac muscle regulation. Changes in the affinity of cTnI for cTnC and its isolated C-terminal domain in response to ionic strength support this finding, with both following similar trends. At physiological ionic strength the affinity of cTnC for cTnI changed very little in response to Ca(2+), although the thermodynamic data show a clear distinction between binding in the presence of Ca(2+) and in the presence of Mg(2+).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Calvert et al. (2000) studied this question. Ca2+ vs. Mg2+ was evaluated on Binding affinity between cTnI and the C-terminal domain of cTnC (8-fold stronger). The interaction between human cardiac troponin I and the C-terminal domain of cardiac troponin C is 8-fold stronger in the presence of Ca2+ compared to Mg2+.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: