Key result
Alternative SCN5A splicing and novel promoters regulate human cardiac Nav1.5 expression and transcript heterogeneity.
May refine SCN5A variant interpretation in channelopathies; leaves open functional roles of specific transcripts in vivo.
The sodium channel isoform Na(v)1.5 mediates sodium current, excitability, and electrical conduction in the human heart. Recent studies have indicated alternative splicing within the protein-coding portion of its gene, SCN5A, as a mechanism to generate diversity in Na(v)1.5 protein structure and function. In the present study we identified several novel SCN5A transcripts in human heart, displaying distinct 5′-untranslated regions but identical protein-coding sequences. These transcripts originated from the splicing of alternative exons 1 (designated 1A, 1B, 1C, and 1D) to the translational start codon-containing exon 2, and were preferentially expressed in the heart as compared to other tissues. Comparison of their expression level between adult and fetal heart demonstrated that exon 1C- and 1D-derived sequences were more prominent in adult than in fetal heart. Two new promoters (designated P2 and P3) for the SCN5A gene were identified and functionally characterized in myocardial- and nonmyocardial-derived cell lines. Translation of the transcript containing exon 1D-derived sequences proved to be significantly impaired in these cell lines, which could be restored by mutation of an upstream translational start codon. These results implicate the usage of alternative promoters and 5′-untranslated regions as new mechanisms in the regulation of human Na(v)1.5 expression.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stuijvenberg et al. (2010) studied this question. Alternative promoter usage and splicing of SCN5A was evaluated on Transcript heterogeneity and regulation of human Na(v)1.5 expression. Alternative splicing of SCN5A exons and usage of new promoters P2 and P3 generate transcript heterogeneity and regulate human Na(v)1.5 expression in the heart.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: