Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
AIM: To investigate the efficacy of 0.2 mL vs. 0.6 mL of 2% lidocaine when given as a supplementary intraligamentary injection after a failed inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB). METHODOLOGY: Ninety-seven adult patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpits received an IANB and root canal treatment was initiated. Pain during treatment was recorded using a visual analogue scale (Heft-Parker VAS). Patients with unsuccessful anaesthesia (n = 78) randomly received intraligamentary injection of either 0.2 mL or 0.6 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1 : 80 000 epinephrine. Root canal treatment was reinitiated. Success after primary injection or supplementary injection was defined as no or mild pain (HP VAS score ≤54 mm) during access preparation and root canal instrumentation. Heart rate was monitored using a finger pulse oximeter. The anaesthetic success rates were analysed with Pearson chi-square test at 5% significance levels. The heart rate changes were analysed using t-tests. There was no significant effect of the volume of intraligamentary injection on the change in heart rate. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing the volume of intraligamentary injection improved the success rates after a failed primary anaesthetic injection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aggarwal et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: