Key result
Novel rotational atherectomy system matches standard device with ~97% 30-day freedom from MACE.
Why the study?
Calcified coronary lesions impede stent delivery and expansion during PCI, and the clinical performance of a novel rotational atherectomy system remained unclear.
Does a novel rotational atherectomy system provide noninferior freedom from 30-day major adverse cardiovascular events compared to an established rotational atherectomy system in patients with calcified coronary lesions undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention?
RCT (n=224)
Open-label
1:1 ratio
Yes
Does a novel rotational atherectomy system provide noninferior freedom from 30-day major adverse cardiovascular events compared to an established rotational atherectomy system in patients with calcified coronary lesions undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention?
A novel rotational atherectomy system with an eccentric burr design demonstrated noninferior safety and efficacy compared to the established Rotablator system for preparing moderately to severely calcified coronary lesions before stenting.
Offers clinicians a noninferior alternative for calcified lesion preparation; confirms safety equivalence in RCT.
BackgroundCalcified coronary lesions present challenges during percutaneous coronary intervention, often impeding successful stent delivery and expansion. Rotational atherectomy (RA) facilitates plaque modification in such cases. However, clinical performance of a novel RA system remains unclear. MethodsThis trial included 2 prospective phases, a first-in-human (FIH) study and a pivotal randomized controlled trial. In the FIH study, 15 patients underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with the novel RA system, and clinical success was assessed. In pivotal trial, 224 patients with calcified lesions were randomized to receive RA using either the novel (n = 111) or established (n = 113) system, followed by stenting. The primary endpoint was freedom from major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization, at 30 days. Secondary endpoints included MACEs at 12 months and quantitative imaging analyses. ResultsAll FIH patients achieved clinical success. In pivotal study, the median follow-up time was 349.5 (IQR: 343, 359) days. Freedom from MACEs at 30 days was 97.3% (108 of 111 vs 110 of 113; 95% CI: 92.3%-99.4% vs 92.4%-99.5%) in both groups (P for noninferiority <0.0001). At 12 months, MACEs remained low in both groups (2.7%; 95% CI: 0.9%-8.1% vs 2.7%; 95% CI: 0.9%-8.0%; P = 1.0000). Postprocedural minimal stent area was similar on intravascular ultrasound between the 2 groups (5.29 ± 1.20 vs 5.29 ± 1.47 mm2, P = 0.9921). ConclusionsThe novel RA system demonstrated noninferior safety and efficacy to established system, offering an effective alternative for the treatment of complex calcified coronary lesions. (CorOnary atheRectomy system in patiEnts with Coronary arTery calcification (CORECT); NCT05447585)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Calcified coronary lesions (n=224). Novel rotational atherectomy system (FireRaptor) vs. Established rotational atherectomy system (Rotablator) was evaluated on Freedom from major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) within 30 days post procedure (Rate difference -0.1%, 95% CI -4.2 to 4.1, p=<0.0001 for noninferiority). The novel rotational atherectomy system was noninferior to the established system, achieving 97.3% freedom from MACEs at 30 days in both groups (rate difference -0.1%, 95% CI -4.2 to 4.1, p<0.0001 for noninferiority).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: