Key result
Ergot dopamine agonists linked to ~22% prevalence of valvular heart disease versus non-ergot agents.
Why the study?
Does treatment with ergot or non-ergot dopamine agonists increase the risk of valvular heart disease in patients with Parkinson's disease?
Observational (n=85)
Single-blind
No
Does treatment with ergot or non-ergot dopamine agonists increase the risk of valvular heart disease in patients with Parkinson's disease?
Absolute Event Rate: 22% vs 3%
p-value: p=0.001
Treatment with ergot dopamine agonists is associated with a higher prevalence of echocardiographic signs suggestive of valvular heart disease compared to non-ergot dopamine agonists, highlighting the need for echocardiographic surveillance.
Supports echocardiographic surveillance in ergot dopamine agonist users; leaves open causality and long-term outcomes.
Objektive: We evaluated the effects of four ergot or non-ergot dopamine agonists (DAs) on morphology and function of heart valves in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) to determine the frequency and clinical relevance of valvular heart disease (VHD) associated with both classes of DAs. Aims: Fibrotic VHD has been reported in association with ergot DAs, but the current database is insufficient, particularly regarding clinical relevance and comparison to data on non-ergot DAs. Methods: 85 PD patients treated with ergot DAs (pergolide, n=25; cabergoline, n=24) or with non-ergot DAs (ropinirole, n=13; pramipexole, n=23) for at least 9 months and without any previous exposure to DAs were evaluated by transthoracic echocardiography. Valvular pathology was assessed according to a VHD scoring system and established criteria of valvular regurgitation. Age-matched probands without DA treatment were used as controls. Results: We did not find any case of proven VHD in both patients and controls. 22% of ergot DA patients (5 pergolide, 6 cabergoline) had suggestive VHD or restrictive tricuspid disease (VHD score 2) vs. 3% of non-ergot DA patients and none of controls (P=0.001). We did not find correlations of echocardiographic findings with duration of treatment, cumulative DA dosage, age or vascular risk factors. Standard quantification of valvular regurgitation showed similar results. Conclusions: Our data suggest that treatment with ergot DAs is associated with higher prevalence of suggestive VHD compared to non-ergot DAs and controls, but the risk to develop clinically relevant VHD is low. The clinical consequence of our data are regular physical and echocardiographic surveillance of PD patients before and during treatment with ergot DAs. We recommend the use of standard grading systems to evaluate valvular pathology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Junghanns et al. (2006) conducted an observational in Parkinson's disease (n=85). Ergot dopamine agonists vs. Non-ergot dopamine agonists and no dopamine agonist treatment (controls) was evaluated on Suggestive valvular heart disease or restrictive tricuspid disease (VHD score 2) (p=0.001). Ergot dopamine agonists were associated with a higher prevalence of suggestive valvular heart disease compared to non-ergot dopamine agonists (22% vs 3%, P=0.001) and controls (0%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: