Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The Cs-promoted Ru nanocatalysts supported on mesoporous carbon materials (denoted as Cs-Ru/MPC) and microporous activated carbon materials (denoted as Cs-Ru/AC) were prepared for the sustainable synthesis of ammonia under mild reaction conditions (<500 °C, 1 MPa). Both Ru and Cs species were homogeneously impregnated into the mesostructures of three commercial available mesoporous carbon materials annealed at 1500, 1800 and 2100 °C (termed MPC-15, MPC-18 and MPC-21, respectively), resulting in a series of Cs-Ru/MPC catalysts with Ru loadings of 2.5–10 wt % and a fixed Cs loading of 33 wt %, corresponding to Cs/Ru molar ratios of 2.5–10. However, the Ru and Cs species are larger than the pore mouths of microporous activated carbon (shortly termed AC) and, as a consequence, were mostly aggregated on the outer surface of the Cs-Ru/AC catalysts. The Cs-Ru/MPC catalysts are superior to the Cs-Ru/AC catalyst in catalysing mild ammonia synthesis, especially for the 2.5Cs-10Ru/MPC-18 catalyst with a Ru loading of 10 wt % and a Cs/Ru ratio of 2.5, which exhibited the highest activity across a wide SV range. It also showed an excellent response and stability during cycling tests over a severe temperature jump in a short time, presumably due to the open mesoporous carbon framework and suitable surface concentrations of CsOH and metallic Ru species at the catalytically active sites. This 2.5Cs-10Ru/MPC-18 catalyst with high activity, fast responsibility and good stability has potential application in intermittently variable ammonia synthesis using CO2-free hydrogen derived from electrolysis of water using renewable energy with fast variability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nishi et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: