Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The ratio of poly(lactic acid) (PLA), poly(butylene adipate- co -terephthalate) (PBAT), and calcium carbonate (CaCO 3 ) fillers in PLA/PBAT/CaCO 3 composites was set at 90/10/5, 70/30/5, and 30/70/5. The effect of nano- and micro-CaCO 3 on the melting and crystallization performance of the composites was investigated by differential scanning calorimetry. PLA crystallization was related to the PLA and PBAT ratio, cooling rate, and CaCO 3 particle size in PLA/PBAT/CaCO 3 composites. Nano-CaCO 3 prevented the crystallization of PLA in PLA/PBAT/CaCO 3 90/10/5 and 70/30/5 but did not prevent the crystallization of PLA in PLA/PBAT/CaCO 3 30/70/5. Unlike nano-CaCO 3 , micro-CaCO 3 did not prevent PLA crystallization regardless of the PLA and PBAT ratio. Nano- and micro-CaCO 3 enhance PLA90 and PLA70 to some extent, due to the aggregation and dissociation of the CaCO 3 filler in polylactic acid. But nano- and micro-CaCO 3 improved the mechanical properties of PLA30 several times, due to the good compatibility of the CaCO 3 filler and PBAT. The effect of nano-CaCO 3 and micro-CaCO 3 on the mechanical properties of PLA/PBAT/CaCO 3 composites had no significant difference.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guo et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: