Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS)—related Kaposi's sarcoma (KS) is a rare aggressive tumor. The benefits of drug therapy are established by clinical trials but it has been a challenge to draw comparisons between the different advanced AIDS-KS pharmacotherapy available. This review aims to evaluate the currently approved chemotherapy drugs for the treatment of AIDS-related advanced KS as well as the economic burden and impact on the quality of life of patients. Relevant articles were identified through a systematic review of the literature via a search of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) PubMed database and the Internet (clinicaltrials.gov) using relevant medical subject heading (MESH) terms. A total of 7 phase II and 4 phase III trials of liposomal anthracyclines (liposomal doxorubicin [PLD] and/or liposomal daunorubicin [DNX]) were identified. An evaluation of the trials comparing PLD to a competitor showed statistical difference p;0.01. DNX phase III trials were also evaluated and showed no statistical differences (p = 0.64). For paclitaxel, 6 clinical trials were selected (5 phase II and 1 phase III); however heterogeneity was not evaluated. 4 cost-effectiveness studies were compared and 3 concluded that PLD is more cost-effective than the competitor. 4 quality of life studies were analyzed. AIDS-KS impacts the patient's life physical, emotional and economic well being. In this work we compared studies of liposomal anthracyclines, still; further research among all the approved drugs for KS is warranted to evaluate efficacy as well as its economic burden worldwide.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Raimundo et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: